From the Editor: The Pulse of the Community

Keep Hope Alive in the FACE of Voter Suppression

Last night, I was listening to Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock on MS-NOW, and his words on voting rights and hope were incredibly impactful—especially during times when our communities feel under attack.
He shared something powerful: hope is not just optimism. Hope is “a shot at working with God to write a new chapter for human possibility.”
That message hit deeply.
Following the 2026 Supreme Court ruling limiting protections under the Voting Rights Act, Senator Warnock called it a “profound defeat for American democracy.” He spoke passionately about how these decisions allow partisan politicians to pick their voters instead of voters choosing their leaders.
But even in that disappointment, he pointed us back to action.
He stressed that if the Court will not protect voting rights, then Congress must act by passing federal legislation like the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to restore those protections and fight voter suppression.
One of the most powerful reminders he gave:
“Voting rights are preservative of all other rights.”
And even more:
“A vote is like a prayer for the community.”
That is the truth.
We cannot be silent. We cannot be discouraged. We must stay engaged, informed, and committed to protecting the power of our vote.
Hope is action.
Hope is faith.
Hope is participation.

I am inspired by Senator Warnock, he is not afraid to TELL it like it is and he has the wisdom, and the backbone to say it loud and say it proud.

ROBIN BECKHAM

April 30, 2025
Founder & Editor
PittsburghUrbanMedia.com

Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock

Follow the DRAFT Money

SHOW ME THE MONEY: Who Really Benefits from the NFL Draft in Pittsburgh?

“Keep your mind on your money, and your money on your mind.” — Snoop Dogg

As the NFL Draft prepares to take over Pittsburgh, the headlines are filled with excitement, projections, and promises of economic growth.

We’re being told this is a transformational moment for the region.

But beneath the surface of the fanfare and forecasts lies a deeper, more important question:

SHOW ME THE MONEY.

Public Dollars, Private Decisions

Let’s start with what we know.

At least $18.9 million in public funding is being directed toward the NFL Draft. That includes a $10 million grant from the state, awarded through the Department of Community and Economic Development’s Marketing to Attract Marquis Events program.

Those funds were given to VisitPittsburgh—a publicly funded nonprofit tasked with marketing and coordinating the event.

The expectation?

That this investment will generate between $120 million and $213 million in economic impact, with projections of 500,000 to 700,000 attendees coming into the city.

Sounds like a win for everyone.

But is it?

The Illusion of “Economic Impact”

“Economic impact” is one of the most powerful phrases used in large-scale events.

It sounds definitive. Measurable. Promising.

But in reality, it’s a projection—often built on models, assumptions, and best-case scenarios before the event even takes place.

How do we determine attendance before the crowds arrive?

How do we guarantee spending that hasn’t happened yet?

And more importantly:

How does that “impact” actually reach the people who live here?

Because “impact” doesn’t automatically mean equity.

Follow the Money

According to public information, VisitPittsburgh has broad discretion on how these funds are spent.

That includes:

Marketing campaigns
Vendor contracts
Staffing and operational costs
Payments to contractors helping execute the event

In other words:

Decisions are being made about who gets access to millions of dollars in opportunity.

And those decisions matter.

Because access determines outcomes.

Let’s Set the Record Straight

There has been a narrative circulating—subtle but persistent—that Black businesses and professionals were somehow unprepared for this moment.

That narrative is not only misleading—it’s false.

Many Black entrepreneurs:

Followed the rules
Applied through the official processes
Positioned themselves for participation

They did exactly what they were told to do.

And still, many are watching from the outside.

Access vs. Optics

This is not about a lack of effort.

This is about access.

Because what continues to play out is a familiar pattern:

“Who you know” relationships driving decisions
Pre-established vendor networks being prioritized
A handful of smaller deals distributed as proof of inclusion

Meanwhile, larger, more lucrative contracts often land in the hands of the same companies that have always had access.

Let’s be honest:

A few small wins do not equal equitable participation.

They create optics—not ownership.

Designed Outcomes

At the end of the day, we have to confront an uncomfortable truth:

Outcomes like this are rarely accidental.

They are often designed.

Designed through networks.
Designed through relationships.
Designed through systems that reward proximity to power.

So when we hear the phrase:

“It’s not what you know, it’s who you know”—

We have to recognize that it’s more than a saying.

It’s a system of access.

A system that determines:

Who gets the call
Who gets in the room
Who gets the contracts
And ultimately… who gets paid

Who Really Benefits?

With so many public resources attached to this event, residents are asking the right questions:

How much economic impact will actually be realized?
Who will see that impact firsthand?
And how will it be reinvested into the communities that need it most?

Because if public dollars are funding this moment, then the benefits should be publicly shared.

Not concentrated.

Not filtered.

Not limited to those already inside the circle.

After the Applause

The stage will be built.
The crowds will come.
The cameras will roll.

And for a moment, Pittsburgh will be the center of the football world.

But when it’s over—when the lights go down and the visitors leave—what will remain?

Will there be lasting opportunity?

Sustainable growth?

Real reinvestment?

Or will this be another moment where:

Public money created private gain—just not for everyone.

Final Word

At the end of the day, the question is simple:

WHO BENEFITS?

Because too often, we find ourselves:

Last to gain
First to be questioned
And expected to be satisfied with scraps instead of shares

Let’s be clear:

Black businesses were ready.
Black professionals showed up.

But the opportunity was filtered.

And until that changes—until access is expanded, transparency is demanded, and equity is intentional—

We will continue to say, louder each time:

SHOW. US. THE. MONEY.

Robin Beckham

Founder & Editor

PittsburghUrbanMedia.com

Author: Memoirs of Missy

April 7, 2026

Article from Public Source with more financial details:

https://www.publicsource.org/nfl-draft-spending-public-investments/

This wasn’t a mistake. It was strategy.

When Strategy Meets Dehumanization: Why That Video Was Not an Accident

When Strategy Meets Dehumanization: Why That Video Was Not an Accident
By Robin Beckham, Editor & Founder, Pittsburgh Urban Media

This morning, I debated whether I was going to share a despicable image with my beautiful Black daughter. As she stood ready for the day—dressed, on time, backpack secured, with hope and promise shining in her eyes—I felt a familiar, sinking pain as a mother. The pain of knowing that once again, I would have to explain something no child should have to carry. The kind of conversation Black parents have far too often. The kind that happens in Black homes when innocence collides with reality.

The image in question—a video released by the President depicting Barack Obama and other Black figures as apes—was not just offensive. It was dangerous. It was dehumanizing. And it was deeply rooted in a long, ugly history that Black people know all too well.

As a PR professional, I understand exactly how and why that video was released, including the intent behind its timing and dissemination. This was not accidental. It was calculated and strategic, not incidental. The rollout followed a familiar and troubling playbook: provoke outrage, dominate the news cycle, and force reaction before reflection can occur. It was engineered for virality, amplified through channels that reward shock, and designed to spread quickly in a digital ecosystem where attention—any attention—is currency.

This is how narratives are manipulated. This is how harm is normalized.

Let’s be clear: portraying Black people as apes is not “humor,” nor is it political commentary. It is one of the oldest tools of racial dehumanization, historically used to justify violence, exclusion, and the denial of basic humanity. When that imagery is resurrected—especially by someone in the highest office in the country—it is not just a dog whistle. It is a declaration of disregard.

And while pundits debate intent, Black parents are left doing damage control at kitchen tables and front doors before school. We are left explaining why someone with power would choose to circulate an image that tells our children, implicitly or explicitly, that they are less than. We are left affirming dignity in a world that too often tries to strip it away.

This is why strategy matters. This is why accountability matters. When harmful content is released deliberately, it is not enough to dismiss it as provocation or political theater. We must name it for what it is: a calculated effort to push boundaries, desensitize the public, and see how much harm can be inflicted without consequence.

In Black homes, we don’t have the luxury of abstraction. These moments are personal. They live in the questions our children ask, in the pauses we take before answering, and in the resilience we are forced to summon yet again.

My daughter deserves a world where her humanity is not up for debate or clicks. And until that world exists, we will continue to tell the truth—about history, about strategy, and about the real-life impact of images that are never just images.

Not when they are intentional. Not when they are strategic. And certainly not when they come at the expense of our children.