“Racism. The belief in the inherent superiority of one race over all others and thereby the right to dominance, manifest and implied. …My response to racism is anger. I have lived with that anger, ignoring it, feeding upon it, learning to use it before it laid my visions to waste, for most of my life. …My fear of anger taught me nothing. ...Women responding to racism means women responding to anger; Anger of exclusion, of unquestioned privilege, of racial distortions, of silence, ill-use, stereotyping, defensiveness, misnaming, betrayal, and co-optation…” (Audre Lorde, 1981, “The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism”)
The effective pursuit of social justice requires that ongoing attention be paid to the systems, structures, strategies, and tactics that uphold a given oppressive system. Accordingly, Women’s History Month is a good time to review the Angry Black Woman(ABW) stereotype which was created by racists to control the narrative related to and, in turn, the behavior of Black American women!
The insidious ABW stereotype’s behavior controlling dynamic is as follows: If Black women do not comply with a submissive persona, then they are deemed to be angry, castrating, intransient, hostile, overbearing, militant, and everything else but civil. Indeed, the ABW stereotype is sadistic in that its perpetrators’ pleasure is derived from Black women enduringthe pain inflicted by realties such as [1] employmentdiscrimination, [2] overrepresentation as victims of violent crimes, [3] the lack of high quality and accessible maternal health care, and, in general [4] being the “mules” of American society! At her best racist and sexist-derived adult persona, the Black woman would be an ingenue awaiting the guidance of her male patriarch.
Resisting the ABW stereotype in 1981, Audre Lorde explained as follows: “…Black women are expected to use our anger only in the service of other people’s salvation or learning. But that time is over. …For it is not the anger of Black women which is dripping down over this globe like a diseased liquid. It is not my anger that launches rockets, spends over sixty thousand dollars a second on missiles and other agents of war and death, slaughters children in cities, stockpiles nerve gas and chemical bombs, sodomizes our daughters and our earth. It is not the anger of Black women which corrodes into blind, dehumanizing power, bent upon the annihilation of us all unless we meet it with what we have, our power to examine and to redefine the terms upon which we will live and work; our power to envision and to reconstruct, anger by painful anger, stone upon heavy stone, a future of pollinating difference and the earth to support our choices.”
When one has been hurt systemically as long as Black American women have, then their personal and collective freedom demand that they not accede to the ABW stereotype. As Maya Angelou stated, “You should be angry. You must not be bitter. Bitterness is like cancer. It eats upon the host. It doesn’t do anything to the object of its displeasure. So, use that anger. You write it. You paint it. You dance it. You march it. You vote it. You do everything about it. You talk it. Never stop talking it.”
Seemingly, National Youth Poet Laureate Amanda Gorman was tuned into Angelou’s advice during the following exchange.
“She’s just a poet. That was the moment the studio changed.
During a live panel discussion, Karoline Leavitt dismissed Amanda Gorman’s comments about the growing disconnect between political messaging and everyday communities, waving her off with a familiar refrain: stick to poetry. The room expected Amanda to offer a polite smile, soften the tension, and retreat into metaphor. She didn’t.
She leaned forward, calm and composed.
‘I may write poems,” she said evenly, but don’t confuse art with naivety. You may see this country through briefing rooms and polling data. I see it through classrooms, communities, and conversations with young people who are shaping its future.’
The atmosphere shifted instantly. Smiles faded. The studio fell quiet.
‘Poetry is built on truth, …On listening closely enough to hear what others overlook. And right now, many Americans feel like their realities are being translated into slogans instead of being understood.’
For a brief moment, there was no response.
No interruption.
No comeback.
Not because the exchange was dramatic—but because it resonated.
Amanda Gorman didn’t argue legislation.
She simply refused to let her art be mistaken for silence.”
FULL STORY: https://verixo.blog/posts/just-hk-khuyen123-team-tien-tntg
In 2026, those who are deemed to be angry Black women should know that they are in great history-making company, e.g., Amanda Gorman, Angel Reese, Lena Horne, Shirey Chisholm, Michele Obama, Maxine Waters, Serena Williams, Anita Hill, Meghan Markle, Alice Walker, Simone Biles, Toni Morrison, Coco Gauff, Shonda Rhimes, and Kamala Harris as well as the multitude of Black women who demand high quality and equal treatment in classrooms, meeting rooms, medical rooms, or simply while using public transportation on a given day after being overworked and underpaid as in the case of Ms. Rosa Parks who was sick and tired of being sick and tired of dealing with the injustices faced by Black people.
I benefitted from a Black woman whom White public-schoolofficials deemed an ABW every time she “showed up and showed out” on my behalf. One notable instance was when, without my or my parents’ inputs, a school official placed me in Industrial Arts instead of the College Curriculum. Unannounced, my Mama went to the school and refused to leave the building until I was signed up for Algebra I, College English, Biology, and the rest of the courses designed for students interested in going on to college. Thanks, Mama, for harnessing your anger and, in turn, launching me on a more than half century career in higher education.
Parenthetically, it would be a significant lacuna if it were not acknowledged herein that all too many Black men have used the ABW stereotype. Some of them have done so to justify things such as [1] their individual abuse of Black women; [2] their romantic relations with women of other races; and [3] their assignment of Black women to secondary leadership roles in Black churches and political organizations.
An especially egregious act by some Black men is the fact that a significant number of them voted for Trump, notwithstanding the fact that “…During an interview …with Fox Business network anchor Maria Bartiromo, Trump launched into a bevy of attacks on women he's deemed his top 2020 targets of the election season. …his distaste for Harris, who identifies as Black and Indian American, stood out as he took most of his time to assail the senator's character. ‘And now, you have - a sort of - a mad woman, I call her, because she was so angry and - such hatred with Justice Kavanaugh,’ Trump told Bartiromo. ‘I mean, I've never seen anything like it. She was the angriest of the group and they were all angry. ... These are seriously ill people.’ …Trump called Harris a ‘nasty’ woman and said she was ‘probably nastier than even Pocahontas to Joe Biden’ during the Democratic debates, referring to Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts…” (See, Trump deploys the 'angry Black woman' trope against Kamala Harris | Congresswoman Frederica Wilson).
Notwithstanding the foregoing dynamics, Maya Angeou’s words still ring true.
“You may write me down in history
With your bitter, twisted lies,
You may trod me in the very dirt
But still, like dust, I'll rise.
…Just like moons and like suns,
With the certainty of tides,
Just like hopes springing high,
Still, I'll rise.
…You may shoot me with your words,
You may cut me with your eyes,
You may kill me with your hatefulness,
But still, like air, I’ll rise…”
Jack L. Daniel, Co-founder Freed Panther Society
Contributor, Pittsburgh Urban Media
Author, Negotiating a Historically White University While Black
March 1, 2026