• Home
  • SUPPORT PUM DONATE
  • About Us - Advertise
  • Latest News
  • Around the Burgh
  • VOTE 2026
  • Black America Today
  • Features
  • Events
  • Business
  • Health & Wellness
  • ART & Music & Culture
  • Racial Equity
  • Movies & Plays
  • Community Engagement
  • The Editor
  • Vote
  • Social Justice
  • Lifestyle with Anji
  • Diversity in Action
  • Food & Entertainment
  • Rainier's Reports /Youth
  • Rainier Reads
  • Book Recommendations
  • Black Music Month
  • The Village
  • Do the RIGHT thing
  • Trailblazers
  • Football
  • Jobs
  • Juneteenth
  • COVID-19
  • Black History 2026
  • Celebrate Black History
  • Dr. Martin Luther King
  • Black History 2025
  • Black History 2024
  • Black History 2023
  • Black History 2022
  • Memoirs of Missy
  • Memoirs of Missy Con't
  • More
    • Home
    • SUPPORT PUM DONATE
    • About Us - Advertise
    • Latest News
    • Around the Burgh
    • VOTE 2026
    • Black America Today
    • Features
    • Events
    • Business
    • Health & Wellness
    • ART & Music & Culture
    • Racial Equity
    • Movies & Plays
    • Community Engagement
    • The Editor
    • Vote
    • Social Justice
    • Lifestyle with Anji
    • Diversity in Action
    • Food & Entertainment
    • Rainier's Reports /Youth
    • Rainier Reads
    • Book Recommendations
    • Black Music Month
    • The Village
    • Do the RIGHT thing
    • Trailblazers
    • Football
    • Jobs
    • Juneteenth
    • COVID-19
    • Black History 2026
    • Celebrate Black History
    • Dr. Martin Luther King
    • Black History 2025
    • Black History 2024
    • Black History 2023
    • Black History 2022
    • Memoirs of Missy
    • Memoirs of Missy Con't
  • Home
  • SUPPORT PUM DONATE
  • About Us - Advertise
  • Latest News
  • Around the Burgh
  • VOTE 2026
  • Black America Today
  • Features
  • Events
  • Business
  • Health & Wellness
  • ART & Music & Culture
  • Racial Equity
  • Movies & Plays
  • Community Engagement
  • The Editor
  • Vote
  • Social Justice
  • Lifestyle with Anji
  • Diversity in Action
  • Food & Entertainment
  • Rainier's Reports /Youth
  • Rainier Reads
  • Book Recommendations
  • Black Music Month
  • The Village
  • Do the RIGHT thing
  • Trailblazers
  • Football
  • Jobs
  • Juneteenth
  • COVID-19
  • Black History 2026
  • Celebrate Black History
  • Dr. Martin Luther King
  • Black History 2025
  • Black History 2024
  • Black History 2023
  • Black History 2022
  • Memoirs of Missy
  • Memoirs of Missy Con't

Black America Today

Barbershop scene urging voters to stand up and vote as if their life depends on it.
Barack Obama awards a medal to John Lewis in a formal ceremony.
Woman in a suit holding a basketball on a court.
Illustration depicting social justice, inequality, and activism themes.
Portrait of Martin Luther King Jr. with civil rights and family images in the background.

Black women journalists targeted?

NABJ Demands Respect for Black Women Journalists

The National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) is calling for an immediate end to the continued tone of disrespect, hostility and public denigration directed at Black women journalists who are doing their jobs.

The latest incident involving ABC News Senior Congressional Correspondent Rachel Scott is part of a larger and deeply troubling pattern: Black women journalists are too often singled out, insulted or demeaned for asking legitimate questions, reporting facts and holding power to account.

No journalist should be subjected to personal attacks, ridicule or intimidation by any elected official for carrying out their professional responsibilities as protected by the First Amendment. Black women journalists have the same right as their colleagues to ask tough questions, pursue the truth and serve the public without being targeted or disrespected.

The president’s reference to “dirt” while insulting a Black woman journalist was especially disturbing. Whatever his intent, the remark landed as part of a familiar pattern in which Black women journalists are demeaned personally rather than answered substantively.

This pattern is not new. Respected Black journalists including April Ryan, Yamiche Alcindor, Jemele Hill, Jasmine Wright and others have faced similar public attacks for doing the work our democracy requires. These incidents do not merely affect individual journalists; they contribute to a hostile climate for Black journalists broadly and undermine the public’s trust in a free and independent press.

“NABJ will always defend the ability of Black journalists to do their jobs fully, freely and safely,” said NABJ President Errin Haines. “When Black women journalists are targeted, insulted or demeaned for asking legitimate questions, it is not only an attack on them personally — it is an attack on the role of a free press in our democracy. We will not allow our members or our profession to be diminished for doing the work the public depends on.”

A free press is not a privilege granted by those in power; it is a constitutional pillar of our democracy. Elected officials at every level have a responsibility to respect the role of journalists, even — and especially — when they are asked questions they do not like.

NABJ will continue to defend the dignity, safety and freedom of Black journalists and all members of the press. Black women journalists must be able to operate with professionalism and integrity, without fear of being targeted, demeaned or retaliated against by those in power.

“Shared Cultural Currency,”

BLACK COLLECTIVE EFFORTS: “United we stand; divided we fall!”

“A Lion used to prowl about a field in which Four Oxen used to dwell. Many a time he tried to attack them; but whenever he came near, they turned their tails to one another, so that whichever way he approached them he was met by the horns of one of them. At last, however, they fell a-quarrelling among themselves, and each went off to pasture alone in a separate corner of the field. Then the Lion attacked them one by one and soon made an end of all four.” (The Four Oxen and The Lion - Fables of Aesop)

A former student shared with me a report that [1] described race-related disparities in wealth, home ownership, health, college loan use, business ownership, etc. but, nevertheless [2] considered the profound possibility of “Black America (being) A Nation Within a Nation.”  The report’s executive summary stated, in part, “with 49.2 million people, Black America is not a subgroup — it is a civilization-scale population. If it were a sovereign nation, it would rank as the 27th most populous country on earth, larger than Canada, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and every nation in Scandinavia combined. Its consumer economy, valued at approximately $1.8 trillion in 2024, would rank among the top 10 economies in the Western Hemisphere and exceed the GDP of most European nations…”  (Black America, A Nation within a Nation, March 2026).

Reports such as the foregoing raise the fundamental question regarding why Black Americans have not more quickly realized our collective economic, political, social, and, in general human potential.  Of course, an immediate factor that takes up much of the variance is the historical and current systemic racism in America.  Nevertheless, it is held herein that greater progress could be obtained by acting on several critical points made by Malcolm X in his Message to the Grassroots.  One relevant point to the discussion herein is the following:

“What you and I need to do is learn to forget our differences. When we come together, we don’t come together as Baptists or Methodists. You don’t catch hell because you’re a Baptist, and you don’t catch hell because you’re a Methodist. You don’t catch hell because you’re a Methodist or Baptist, you don’t catch hell because you’re a Democrat or a Republican, you don’t catch hell because you’re a Mason or an Elk, and you sure don’t catch hell because you’re an American; because if you were an American, you wouldn’t catch hell. You catch hell because you’re a black man. You catch hell, all of us catch hell, for the same reason…”  

Until the foregoing message is fully “digested,” Black America cannot become “a nation within a nation.” 

A second relevant point made by Malcolm X focused on the differential reactions by Blacks in response to the racism they experienced on plantations.  More specifically, he stated:

“…If you came to the house Negro and said, ‘Let's run away. Let's escape. Let's separate,’ the house Negro would look at you and say, ‘Man, you crazy. What you mean, separate? Where is there a better house than this? Where can I wear better clothes than this? Where can I eat better food than this?’ …This modern house Negro loves his master. He wants to live near him. He'll pay three times as much as the house is worth just to live near his master, and then brag about ‘I'm the only Negro out here.’ ‘I'm the only one on my job.’ ‘I'm the only one in this school. …you'd say the same thing that the house Negro said on the plantation, ‘What you mean, separate? From America? This good white man? Where you going to get a better job than you get here?’  I mean, this is what you say. ‘I ain't left nothing in Africa…’ That's what you say. Why, you left your mind in Africa…”

“…On that same plantation, there was the field Negro. The field Negro — those were the masses. …The Negro in the field caught hell. He ate leftovers. In the house they ate high up on the hog. The Negro in the field didn’t get nothing but what was left of the insides of the hog. They call ’em “chitt’lin’” nowadays. In those days they called them what they were: guts. …And some of you all still gut-eaters.  The field Negro was beaten from morning to night. He lived in a shack, in a hut; He wore old, castoff clothes. He hated his master. I say he hated his master. He was intelligent. That house Negro loved his master. But that field Negro — remember, they were in the majority, and they hated the master. When the house caught on fire, he didn’t try and put it out; that field Negro prayed for a wind, for a breeze. When the master got sick, the field Negro prayed that he’d die. If someone come [sic] to the field Negro and said, ‘Let’s separate, let’s run,’ he didn’t say ‘Where we going?’ He’d say, ‘Any place is better than here.’”

Before going further, herein it is held that the current lack of greater collective Black progress is  not, at root, a “house Negro” versus “field Negro” problem. Rather, the concepts of “house” and “field” Negro underscore the impact of diverse racist socialization patterns as well as different individual responses to the same racism, resulting in many intersections of what it is to be Black.  Stated differently, Black is made complex by differences in religious beliefs and related practices; educational levels; sexual orientations;  residence; and other socio-economic, cultural factors.  Hence, to underscore our differences, there exists the often-heard quote, “All Black folk ain’t kinfolk.”  Yet, if there ever will be a time that Blacks will have some semblance of “a nation within a nation,” then it is essential that we transcend the differences that exist among us.    

Given the reality of living with the rules of a Constitution; federal, state, and local laws; a national language; a capitalist economic system; etc., no racial group can literally become a “nation within a nation.”  However, Black folk can better harness their economic, social, political potential if we set aside our differences and coalesce to do things such as [1] elect Black officials at all levels, particularly where we have significant numbers of eligible voters; [2] focus Black spending on businesses owned and operated by Blacks; [3] develop exponentially the number of Black entrepreneurs; [4] support Historically Black Colleges and Universities as well as programmatic Black initiatives on Historically White Campuses; [5] eliminate patriarchy, sexism, and homophobia within the Black community; and [6] develop long-range educational initiatives to produce Blacks with credentials for jobs where the Black Community and the larger society have the greatest needs for educated professionals, e.g., scientific and quantitative-based fields.  In addition, we would do well to recall a lesson from Pennsylvania’s former Black Speaker of the House, the Honorable K. Leroy Irvis.

During my “activist” days at the University of Pittsburgh, I and others often met privately with Speaker Irvis. One day, we asked him to comment on his effectiveness as a Black legislator in an overwhelmingly White legislative body.  He said, essentially that he listened to other people to gain an appreciation for their concerns; shared his concerns with them; and, in turn, built coalitions with them.  As such, Speaker Irvis underscored the fact that “…collective action is far more durable and effective when it transcends racial, class, age, and gender boundaries. From the Mississippi Freedom Movement to various Rainbow Coalitions, collaboration and coalition-building across social positions—despite the challenges and potential for tension—attract participants with a wider toolkit of resources, opportunities, and tactics.” (See, https://time.com/7307042/history-coalition-building/).  Accordingly, in 2026 and beyond, coalitions will be needed to make America what it ought to be in terms of its constitutional aspirations.  

Finally, if there is to be an approximation of Blacks being a nation within a nation, there must be a “shared cultural currency,” i.e., a set of values, beliefs, practices, rituals, and goals that are shared among the various groupings of Blacks.  For that, we would do well to practice the following 7 principles of Kwanzaa:

  • 1. Umoja (Unity): To strive for and maintain unity in the family, community, nation, and race. 
  • 2. Kujichagulia (Self-Determination): To define ourselves, name ourselves, create for ourselves and speak for ourselves.
  • 3. Ujima (Collective Work and Responsibility): To build and maintain our community together and make our community’s problems our problems and to solve them together.
  • 4. Ujamaa (Cooperative Economics): To build and maintain our own stores, shops and other businesses and to profit from them together.
  • 5. Nia (Purpose): To make our collective vocation the building and developing of our community in order to restore our people to their traditional greatness.
  • 6. Kuumba (Creativity): To do always as much as we can to leave our community more beautiful and beneficial than we inherited it.
  • 7. Imani (Faith): To believe with all our hearts in our people and the righteousness and victory of our struggle. (See, The Seven Principles of Kwanzaa | National Museum of African American History and Culture)

Jack L. Daniel

Co-founder, Freed Panther Society

Contributor, Pittsburgh Urban Media

Author, Negotiating a Historically White University While Black

April 29, 2026

The Supreme Court Ruling

NAACP Condemns Supreme Court's Ruling Against Voting Rights


PITTSBURGH BRANCH NAACP CONDEMNS SUPREME COURT'S ASSAULT ON THE VOTING RIGHTS 


Pittsburgh NAACP Calls Today's Ruling in Louisiana v. Callais a Betrayal of the American Promise of Equal Representation


PITTSBURGH, PA — The Pittsburgh Branch NAACP stands in strong and unequivocal opposition to today's 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which deals a devastating blow to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 — one of the most consequential civil rights achievements in American history.This Court has done what generations of segregationists could not do through legislation: it has gutted the legal shield that protected Black and Brown communities from the dilution of their political power. We are outraged, and we will not be silent.The Voting Rights Act was born from the blood shed on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama. The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and thousands of marchers risked their lives so that Black Americans could exercise the most fundamental right of citizenship. Today, six Supreme Court justices have chosen to dishonor that sacrifice.The ruling effectively invalidates Section 2 of the VRA as it has been todays understood for four decades — by imposing an intentionality requirement that Congress deliberately rejected when it amended the law in 1982.  As Justice Elena Kagan stated plainly in her dissent, this decision "eviscerates the law."Combined with the Court's 2019 decision in Rucho v. Common Cause, which held that courts cannot block partisan gerrymandering, Callais decision effectively declares all gerrymandering constitutional.  This is a green light for state legislatures across the country — including in Pennsylvania to draw maps that silence Black and Latino voters.The Pittsburgh Branch NAACP made Protecting the Vote a major priority, therefore we call on Congress to act immediately to restore and strengthen the Voting Rights Act. We call on every elected official in Western Pennsylvania to publicly take a stand. "This decision does not end our fight — it deepens it. 


WASHINGTON -- In reaction to the Supreme Court's ruling in Louisiana vs. Callais, NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson released the following statement:

"Today's decision is a devastating blow to what remains of the Voting Rights Act, and a license for corrupt politicians who want to rig the system by silencing entire communities. The Supreme Court betrayed Black voters, they betrayed America, and they betrayed our democracy. This ruling is a major setback for our nation and threatens to erode the hard-won victories we've fought, bled, and died for. But the people still can fight back. Our best defense and offense is the ballot box, and we're going to turn out voters for the midterm elections to make sure we can elect representatives who look out for us. Our democracy is crying for help."

Kristen Clarke, NAACP General Counsel added: 

"This is one of the most-consequential and devastating rulings issued by the Supreme Court in the 21st Century. The Supreme Court has put the death knell into our nation's most important federal civil rights law, one that provided Black Americans access to a democracy that they had long been excluded from. The ruling defies precedent, ignores statutory text, and will reverse decades of progress we have made as a nation. This will embolden lawmakers in former slave-holding states to target and eradicate districts that have provided Black Americans a fair opportunity to elect candidates of choice, and they will do so with the blessing of this Court. It ignores the tremendous sacrifice made by Americans who bled and died for passage of the Voting Rights Act.

"Expect more Americans to call into question the integrity and independence of this Court which is moving unabashedly and at lightning speed to dismantle our bedrock civil rights protections.

"The NAACP will not stand by idly in the face of this ruling which seeks to diminish our standing and render us second-class citizens. This is not a moment for any one of us to sit on the sidelines. We are witnessing the full machinery of government aided by the Court disenfranchising and silencing Black America and hijacking democracy as we know it. We will continue to fight and ensure that our voices are heard this midterm election cycle."

Break Through

THE “FIRST BLACKS” WHO “BROKE COLOR BARRIERS”

As is well-known, [1] Jackie Robinson “broke the color barrier” when he became “the first Black” to play in Major League Baseball; [2] Barak Obama and Michelle Obama did so when they became the first Black President and First Lady of the United States; [3] Ketanji Brown Jackson became the first Black Woman to join the Supreme Court; and [4] Victor Glover was the first Black man to go around the moon and return to earth.  Thus, it came as no surprise when some made much ado about Victor Glover being the first Black Man to do so.  What did surprise many was Glover’s response to being a first Black man, i.e., he said, “I also hope…that one day we don’t have to talk about these ‘firsts’ ...It’s the story of humanity, not black history, not women’s  history…”  Glover’s responses also redirected attention to the professional qualifications of people  --much like  Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. urging us to judge people by the content of their character as opposed to the color of their skin.  

The implications of the above remarks by Glover can be explored by considering, for example, the case of President Obama.  Instead of focusing on President Obama being a “first Black male,” what if, without reference to his race and sex,  President Obama was  noted for things such as the following:

1.  Passed Health Care Reform

2.  Rescued the Economy

3.  Passed Wall Street Reform

4.  Negotiated a Deal to Block a Nuclear Iran

5.  Secured U.S. Commitment to a Global Agreement on Climate Change

6.  Turned Around the U.S. Auto Industry

7.  Repealed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”

8.  Supported Federal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages

9.  Normalized Relations with Cuba

10.  Put Medicare on Sounder Financial Footing

(See https://washingtonmonthly.com/2017/01/03/obamas-top-50-accomplishments-revisited/)

Moreover, imagine an emphasis on the fact that President Obama achieved spectacularly notwithstanding the fact that, regarding President Obama’s agenda,  former Speaker of the House John Boehner declared “We’re going to do everything — and I mean everything we can do — to kill it, stop it, slow it down, whatever we can.”  Not to be outdone as an obstructionist, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnel stated, “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”  (https://www.politico.com/story/2010/10/the-gops-no-compromise-pledge-044311)

Ideally, Glover’s and King’s above sentiments are what we should seek.  Unfortunately, America remains a systemic, racist, caste-like, White patriarchal, homophobic, xenophobic  society and, after centuries of legal and de facto oppression, that is the primary reason why we should acknowledge “first Blacks” who “break various color barriers,”  who achieve monumentally despite efforts to tear them asunder.  It is exponentially worthy of more than a gold medal to [1] “come up from nowhere;” [2] make a successful journey from “the wrong side of the mountain;” or [3] climb out of a “valley where you couldn’t hear nobody pray” --all within an ecosystem designed to, at a minimum, hold you down;  make you have to run faster than others to achieve the same result; be twice as good;  threaten your life, and indeed kill you for nothing more than registering to vote or fleeing from a police officer having committed no crime and with your hands held over your head.  

To appreciate what often must be overcome enroute to becoming the “first Black” to break various color barriers, consider the following: 

[1] Oprah Windfrey, Tyler Perry, Halle Berry, Lil Kim, Tupac Shakur, and Steve Harvey experienced homelessness  (See, https://aspire.tv/tribe-talk/9-black-public-figures-who-overcame-homelessness/.).

[2] The great scientist George Washington Carver was born into slavery and Madam C.J. Walker was a child of slaves.  

[3] President Obama was raised by his single parent mother and grandparents; 

[4] Vice President Kamala Harris was raised by a single parent mother. 

[5] Regarding Malcolm X, “ When Malcolm was six years old, his father, the Rev. Earl Little, a Baptist minister and former supporter of the early Black nationalist leader Marcus Garvey, died after being hit by a streetcar, quite possibly the victim of murder by whites. The surviving family was so poor that Malcolm’s mother, Louise Little, resorted to cooking dandelion greens from the street to feed her children. After she was committed to an insane asylum in 1939, Malcolm and his siblings were sent to foster homes or to live with family members.” (See, Malcolm X | Biography, Nation of Islam, As  assassination, & Facts | Britannica) 

[6] Viola Davis grew up in poverty, with rats in her home (See, https://www.nickiswift.com/1454743/viola-davis-childhood-devastating-details/).

It is with the foregoing understanding of the resilience required to overcome significant societal obstacles and, in turn, break color barriers that  Langston Hughes wrote, 

“Well, son, I’ll tell you:

Life for me ain’t been no crystal stair.

It’s had tacks in it,

And splinters,

And boards torn up,

And places with no carpet on the floor—

Bare.

But all the time

I’se been a-climbin’ on,

And reachin’ landin’s,

And turnin’ corners,

And sometimes goin’ in the dark

Where there ain’t been no light.

So boy, don’t you turn back.

Don’t you set down on the steps

’Cause you finds it’s kinder hard.

Don’t you fall now—

For I’se still goin’, honey,

I’se still climbin’,

And life for me ain’t been no crystal stair.”

Finally, on a personal note, my four grandparents were born one generation out of slavery, and they never attended public school.  My parents grew up on subsistence living farms in segregated Goochland County Virginia.  Racial segregation limited them to grade school educations.  Throughout my grade school years, we lived in public housing. Yet, my ancestors’  and others’ foundational work enabled me to become a first-generation college student who earned a baccalaureate, masters, and  doctoral degree; marry a woman who earned a doctoral degree; raise two children both of whom earned doctoral degrees; and live to see our four grandchildren all earn college degrees, two, of them having earned graduate degrees—one from the University of Michigan and the other from Harvard University.  Many more “first Blacks” will “break barriers” when equity and social justice become normative.

Jack L. Daniel

Co-founder, Freed Panther Society

Contributor, Pittsburgh Urban Media

Author, Negotiating a Historically White University While Black

April 21, 2026

Astronaut Victor Glover is the first Black person to travel to the Moon, serving as the pilot for NA

Astronaut Victor Glover is the first Black person to travel to the Moon.

“Funny You Should Ask” Joins Late-Night Lineup

‘Comics Unleashed with Byron Allen’ to replace the ‘Late Show’ on CBS

“Funny You Should Ask” Joins Late-Night Lineup at 12:35 AM

  • CBS moves the Byron Allen-hosted comedy talk show COMICS UNLEASHED with BYRON ALLEN to the 11:35 PM time slot beginning Friday, May 22. COMICS UNLEASHED will air Monday through Friday with back-to-back half-hour episodes (11:35 PM-12:37 AM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network, and available to stream live on Paramount+*.
  • The comedy game show FUNNY YOU SHOULD ASK, hosted by Jon Kelley, joins CBS’ late-night lineup with back-to-back half-hour episodes Monday through Friday beginning Friday, May 22(12:37-1:37 AM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network, and available to stream live on Paramount+*.
  • “I created and launched COMICS UNLEASHED 20 years ago so my fellow comedians could have a platform to do what we all love – make people laugh,” said Byron Allen, founder/chairman/CEO of Allen Media Group. “I truly appreciate CBS’ confidence in me by picking up our two-hour comedy block of COMICS UNLEASHED and FUNNY YOU SHOULD ASK, because the world can never have enough laughter.”
  • COMICS UNLEASHED, produced by Allen Media Group and executive produced by Byron Allen, Carolyn Folks, Jennifer Lucas, Jodi Miller, Peter Steen and Dylan King has been airing in first-run strip syndication since its premiere in September 2006 and can be seen on CBS owned-and-operated television stations nationwide.
  • FUNNY YOU SHOULD ASK, produced by Allen Media Group and executive produced by Byron Allen, Carolyn Folks, Jennifer Lucas, Bob Boden, Jodi Miller, Peter Steen, Scott Satin and Eric Charbonnel has been airing in first-run strip syndication since its premiere in September 2017 and can be seen on CBS owned-and-operated television stations nationwide.

Victor J. Glover, Jr., NASA astronaut

First Black person to travel to the Moon as the pilot of the Artemis II mission

Victor J. Glover, Jr. is a NASA astronaut, U.S. Navy Captain, and test pilot who made history as the first Black astronaut to complete a long-duration mission on the International Space Station (ISS) in 2021. He is further set to become the first Black person to travel to the Moon as the pilot of the Artemis II mission.

Key Achievements and Career:

  • SpaceX Crew-1 (2020-2021): Served as pilot on the first crewed operational flight of the SpaceX Crew Dragon, spending 168 days in space, conducting four spacewalks, and serving as a flight engineer.
  • Artemis II Pilot: Selected as pilot for the 2026 lunar flyby mission, which will be the first crewed trip beyond low Earth orbit since 1972.
  • Background: Born April 30, 1976, in Pomona, California, Glover is a graduate of California Polytechnic State University and a Navy test pilot with over 3,000 flight hours in more than 40 aircraft.
  • Accomplishments: He was selected as an astronaut in 2013 and is a recipient of the NASA Distinguished Service Medal. 

Glover is known for his work in both scientific research aboard the ISS and as a test pilot contributing to future deep-space exploration.


Background and Qualifications

  • Education: He holds a Bachelor of Science in General Engineering from Cal Poly and three Master’s degrees in Flight Test Engineering, Systems Engineering, and Military Operational Art and Science.
  • Military Service: A career Naval Aviator and test pilot, Glover has accumulated over 3,000 flight hours in more than 40 different aircraft and completed 24 combat missions.
  • NASA Selection: He was chosen as part of the 21st NASA astronaut class in 2013 from a pool of over 6,100 applicants. 

Artemis II CrewGlover will fly alongside a historic crew:

  • Reid Wiseman: Commander (NASA)
  • Christina Koch: Mission Specialist (NASA) – first woman on a lunar mission.
  • Jeremy Hansen: Mission Specialist (CSA) – first Canadian on a lunar mission. 

The mission is designed as a 10-day lunar flyby to test the systems of the Orion spacecraft before future landing missions. 

Victor J. Glover, Jr., NASA astronaut

The Obama Foundation

Obama Presidential Center Announces Grand Opening Celebrations: June 18-21

The Obama Foundation announced today that the Obama Presidential Center’s grand opening celebrations will begin on June 18 and last through June 21, with a series of events that bring together the changemakers, community members, volunteers, and supporters who made the Obama presidency a reality and that welcome visitors to celebrate the power of hope and change.

  • June 18: Dedication Ceremony on the John Lewis Plaza, with global livestream featuring legendary performances by global icons and powerful remarks from today’s most prominent voices
  • June 19: Campus and Museum Open to the Public  
  • June 20 and 21: Community Celebrations Throughout Campus 

President Obama shared the announcement this morning in a video on social media and the Foundation will celebrate in person tonight with hundreds of community members. 

He says: "It is easy to look around right now and feel like the challenges we face are simply too big. But hope is not about ignoring the hard stuff. It is that thing inside us that insists something better awaits if we are willing to work for it. Here on the South Side of Chicago, hope is getting a permanent home. Starting on June 19, you can visit the Obama Presidential Center. This is not a monument to the past; it is a living destination for people who refuse to accept the status quo. If you feel that way, this is your invitation to join us.”

This day, March 7, holds special meaning as the anniversary of the civil rights marches from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama. President Obama marked the 50th anniversary of the marches in one of his most cherished speeches, with the resounding call to advance the “glorious task we are given to continually try to improve this great nation of ours.” Those very words are inscribed on the Museum building’s exterior, starting with “You Are America.” 

The same instinct animates changemakers across the globe and is central to the Foundation’s mission to inspire, empower, and connect people to change their world.

“We have always believed in the power of ordinary people to come together to make extraordinary change,” said Valerie Jarrett, Foundation CEO. “The opening of the Obama Presidential Center will be a beacon of hope to the world and a place where we hope guests will be inspired to bring change home to their communities.”

The Center will be dedicated on Thursday, June 18, and the campus, including all free areas as well as the Museum, will open to the public on June 19. Grand opening celebrations will continue on June 20 and 21 with live performances, family-friendly activities, food, art, and storytelling across campus. The public events will be preceded by gatherings for alumni, community members, supporters and young people. 

The majority of the Presidential Center is free and open to the public. Amenities will include: 

  • an accessible and innovative playground
  • a Forum building for public programming
  • public art installations
  • beautifully landscaped park space and walkways that will connect the Center to the Museum of Science and Industry and adjacent lagoons
  • a branch of the Chicago Public Library. 

Tickets to the Center’s Museum will be available this May, and pricing will be in line with other Chicago cultural institutions. Museum entry will require a timed ticket, but other areas of the 19.3 acre campus are free and accessible. 

More details on the globally livestreamed dedication ceremony and free public festival will be released closer to the events. Those who want to be the first to receive information are invited to sign up at Obama.org  (Opens in a new tab).

“This grand opening is just the beginning,” added Jarrett. “The Obama  Presidential Center is about the everyday people who make our democracy work, not just those we see in the headlines. As President Obama said: It is easy to look around right now and feel like the challenges we face are simply too big. But hope is not about ignoring the hard stuff. It is that thing inside us that insists something better awaits if we are willing to work for it. That is the spirit of the Obama Presidential Center. We can’t wait to welcome people this June.”

Pennsylvania Leaders Respond as Slavery Exhibit Returns

Philadelphia’s slavery exhibit is restored at the President’s House

Pennsylvania Leaders Respond as Slavery Exhibit Returns

Community leaders across Pennsylvania are expressing a mixture of reflection, resolve, and renewed commitment following the decision to reinstall a slavery-focused historical exhibit that had previously been removed.

The exhibit — which documents the realities of enslavement, the transatlantic slave trade, and Pennsylvania’s complex role in America’s early history — has once again opened its doors to the public. Its return has sparked conversation across civic, educational, and faith communities.

“History Must Be Told in Full”

Several elected officials and community advocates emphasized that confronting difficult history is essential to building a stronger future.

“This is not about politics,” one regional leader said. “It’s about truth. If we want healing, we have to acknowledge the full story — even the painful chapters.”

Pennsylvania holds a unique place in the nation’s history. While known for its role in founding American democracy and as a critical hub in the Underground Railroad, the state was also economically and socially tied to systems of enslavement in its early years.

“The exhibit reminds us that freedom in America did not begin equally for everyone,” a local historian noted. “Understanding that context matters.”

Faith Leaders Call It a Moment of Reflection

Clergy members from across the state have also weighed in, describing the exhibit’s return as an opportunity for education and moral reflection.

One pastor described the restoration as “a necessary step toward honest dialogue,” adding that faith communities have a responsibility to support truth-telling and reconciliation.

The language of hope and justice echoed sentiments long championed by civil rights advocates, including figures like the Rev. Jesse Jackson, whose message of confronting injustice while “keeping hope alive” continues to resonate in moments like this.

Educators Stress the Importance for Young People

Teachers and education leaders say the exhibit provides critical context for students navigating today’s conversations about race, equity, and identity.

“When students see accurate history presented thoughtfully, it builds understanding rather than division,” said one school administrator. “Silence creates confusion. Education creates clarity.”

A Community Conversation Continues

While some debate remains about how history should be presented in public spaces, many leaders agree that removing or minimizing difficult truths does not serve future generations.

The exhibit’s reinstatement signals what many describe as a recommitment to historical integrity.

“We can’t move forward if we erase where we’ve been,” one community advocate said. “This is about remembrance, respect, and responsibility.”

As visitors begin returning to the exhibit, conversations are expected to continue — not just about the past, but about how communities across Pennsylvania move toward a more inclusive future.


Pennsylvania Leaders Weigh In on Restoration of Slavery Exhibit

Leaders across Pennsylvania are responding to the decision to restore a slavery-focused historical exhibit, describing it as an important step toward preserving truth and fostering meaningful dialogue.

State Leadership

In a statement addressing the exhibit’s reinstatement, Governor Josh Shapiro emphasized the importance of confronting history in its entirety, noting that honest education strengthens democracy and civic understanding.

Pennsylvania House Speaker Joanna McClinton highlighted the role of public institutions in ensuring that historical narratives reflect both the achievements and the injustices that shaped the Commonwealth. She underscored that education about slavery and its lasting impact remains critical to policy conversations today.

Pittsburgh Leaders Respond

In Western Pennsylvania, Ed Gainey described the exhibit’s return as an opportunity for continued reflection and learning. He has consistently spoken about equity, inclusion, and ensuring that historical truths are not minimized.

Leadership from the NAACP Pittsburgh Branch also supported the exhibit’s restoration, calling it an essential reminder of the systemic foundations that continue to influence disparities in housing, education, and economic opportunity.

Philadelphia Perspective

In Eastern Pennsylvania, Cherelle Parker acknowledged the importance of public history in shaping civic identity. Philadelphia’s deep historical ties to the nation’s founding make conversations about slavery and freedom especially complex and necessary, she noted in remarks supporting comprehensive historical representation.

A Broader Conversation

While discussions continue around how history should be presented in public spaces, leaders across the Commonwealth appear aligned on one point: confronting difficult chapters of history is necessary for progress.

The exhibit’s return has reignited conversations statewide — not only about the past, but about how Pennsylvania continues working toward equity and inclusion.

"I will not back down"

Don Lemon, Others Plead Not Guilty to Minnesota Church Protest Charges

Former CNN anchor and independent journalist Don Lemon and several others pleaded not guilty on Friday, February 13, 2026, to federal civil rights charges tied to a protest at Cities Church in St. Paul. 

The charges stem from a demonstration on January 18 in which protesters — including Lemon — entered the church during a service. The protest targeted immigration enforcement policies and drew national attention after activists interrupted worship and chanted slogans. Federal prosecutors allege the actions violated the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a law that makes it illegal to obstruct or intimidate individuals exercising their First Amendment rights at places of worship. 

Lemon and eight others face charges including conspiracy to deprive civil rights and interfering with religious freedoms. Several fellow defendants arraigned Friday also entered not-guilty pleas, and additional arraignments are scheduled for next week. 

Lemon’s Statement Today

After his court appearance, Lemon maintained his innocence and framed the charges as an attack on press freedom. According to his remarks outside the federal courthouse:

“For more than 30 years, I’ve been a journalist, and the power and protection of the First Amendment has been the underpinning of my work. The First Amendment, the freedom of the press, are the bedrock of our democracy,” Lemon said.
“And like all of you here in Minnesota, the great people of Minnesota, I will not be intimidated, I will not back down.”

Dozens of Lemon’s supporters gathered outside the courthouse, chanting slogans in defense of press freedom and free speech.

Pa. Governor condemns racist Obama video

Trump removes racist video depicting the Obamas as apes

On February 6, 2026, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro strongly condemned 

 a video shared on Truth Social by President Donald Trump that depicted former President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as apes.

“I actually agree with Senator Tim Scott that it’s racist,” said the governor. “The idea that anyone would post a video like that, let alone the President of the United States, someone who’s supposed to find ways to bring us together, someone who’s supposed to appeal to our better angels. 

“This guy seems to always find a lower and lower common denominator,” he continued. “Here in Pennsylvania, we respect all people, no matter what they look like, where they come from, who they love, who they pray to or who they choose not to pray to. We don’t scapegoat others, and we certainly don’t peddle in racist videos and other racist statements like this President has made. He needs to do better.” Governor Shapiro vowed that Pennsylvanians would not get "sucked down into the depths that this President seems to reach for every day". 


The White House initially defended the post as a "Lion King" meme but deleted it several hours later, attributing the post to a staffer's error.


President Trump sparked national condemnation after sharing a video on Truth Social that contained a racist depiction of former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama. 

 

The imagery, appearing at the end of a 62-second video promoting 2020 election conspiracy theories, showed the Obamas' faces superimposed onto the bodies of apes. The clip was set to the song "The Lion Sleeps Tonight".


Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt initially dismissed the backlash as "fake outrage," describing the video as an internet meme portraying Trump as the "King of the Jungle. Following widespread bipartisan criticism—including from Republican Senator Tim Scott, who called it "the most racist thing I've seen out of this White House"—the post was deleted roughly 12 hours later. A White House official later claimed a staffer had "erroneously" shared it.

 The incident occurred during Black History Month, intensifying the backlash from organizations like the NAACP, which called the imagery a "stark reminder" of underlying biases.

Dismantled Slave Exhibit

PA Gov takes legal action regarding the removal of the Slavery Exhibit at historic site

Updated story:

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro has taken formal legal action to support Philadelphia’s lawsuit challenging the removal of a slavery exhibit from Independence Mall, escalating a growing dispute over how American history is presented at one of the nation’s most significant historic sites.

Shapiro filed a legal brief backing the city’s case against the U.S. Department of the Interior and the National Park Service, which removed exhibit panels from the President’s House memorial at Independence National Historical Park. The exhibit detailed the lives of nine enslaved people held by George Washington while he lived in Philadelphia during the 1790s.

Philadelphia officials argue the removal violated a 2006 cooperative agreement between the city and the federal government that requires consultation and shared authority over the site’s interpretive content. The city’s lawsuit contends the decision was made unilaterally and amounts to an improper erasure of critical historical context.

In supporting the lawsuit, Shapiro said Pennsylvania has a strong interest in preserving an accurate and complete account of the nation’s history, particularly as the country approaches the 250th anniversary of its founding. He has characterized the exhibit’s removal as an attempt to “whitewash” history and warned that allowing it to stand could set a precedent for political interference in historic interpretation.

The National Park Service has said the exhibit was removed as part of a broader review of content at federally managed sites, a justification that has drawn sharp criticism from city leaders, historians and civil rights advocates. They argue the President’s House memorial was intentionally designed to confront the contradiction between the nation’s founding ideals and the reality of slavery.

The case now moves to federal court, where a judge is expected to consider Philadelphia’s request for a preliminary injunction that would require the exhibit to be restored while litigation continues. In recent weeks, protesters have gathered at Independence Mall calling for the return of the panels and for the preservation of a full and honest historical narrative.

City officials say the lawsuit is not only about a single exhibit, but about safeguarding the integrity of public history at a site central to the nation’s identity.



 January 22, 2026, National Park Service (NPS) workers dismantled the slavery exhibit at the President’s House Site in Philadelphia’s Independence National Historical Park. The removal has sparked immediate legal action and intense public controversy. 

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro strongly criticized the removal, calling it an attempt to "whitewash" history. He stated that Donald Trump was trying to "rewrite and whitewash our history," but had chosen the wrong city and Commonwealth for such an action. Shapiro emphasized the importance of learning from history, even when it is difficult, and that protecting history means "telling the truth".

Reason for Removal

  • Executive Order: The removal follows a March 2025 executive order from President Donald Trump titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History". The directive ordered federal agencies to review and remove interpretive materials that "inappropriately disparage" the United States or promote "divisive narratives".
  • Department of the Interior Statement: Officials stated the exhibit was dismantled to ensure "alignment with shared national values" following a required review of park materials. 

Details of the Dismantled Exhibit

  • Content: Opened in 2010, the outdoor exhibit titled "Freedom and Slavery in the Making of a New Nation" memorialized nine enslaved individuals held by George Washington at the site: Austin, Christopher Sheels, Giles, Hercules, Joe Richardson, Moll, Oney Judge, Paris, and Richmond.
  • Actions Taken: NPS crews used crowbars to rip placards from walls and unbolted informational panels detailing the slave trade and the paradox of freedom at the nation's founding.
  • Remaining Elements: While most displays were removed, the names of the nine enslaved people etched into the building's stone wall reportedly remained as of January 22. 

Responses and Legal Action

  • Lawsuit: The City of Philadelphia filed a federal lawsuit on January 22 seeking a preliminary injunction to restore the exhibits. The city argues that a 2006 cooperative agreement requires the federal government to consult with city officials before making changes to the site.
  • Political Response: Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Philadelphia City Council President Kenyatta Johnson condemned the move as an attempt to "whitewash" American history.
  • Activist Outcry: Michael Coard, a founder of the Avenging The Ancestors Coalition (ATAC)—the group that spent years advocating for the memorial's creation—called the removal "historical blasphemy" and "blatantly racist".


On January 23, 2026, the NAACP Philadelphia Branch officially condemned the removal of the slavery exhibit from the President’s House site at Independence National Historical Park. NAACP Philadelphia Statement Branch President Catherine Hicks released a statement asserting that the removal "erases the contributions and struggles of enslaved individuals" and undermines the public's ability to engage with the true narrative of American history. 


The NAACP Philadelphia Branch firmly condemns the dismantling of the slavery exhibit from the President's House as directed by the recent executive order from Trump. 

This decision represents a troubling attempt to whitewash critical aspects of our nation's history, particularly regarding President George Washington and the realities of slavery that were housed in his Philadelphia residence. 

Removing this exhibit not only erases the contributions and struggles of enslaved individuals but also undermines the educational opportunities for our community to engage with the true narrative of our past. 

History is not merely a collection of celebrated moments; it encompasses the full spectrum of human experience, including the painful truths that shape our society. Truths we must never forget! 

This action is a disservice to our City and our Nation, as it denies future generations the chance to learn from our history, fostering an environment of ignorance rather than understanding. We must confront the complexities of our past, honoring the lives and legacies of those who suffered under the institution of slavery. 

The Philadelphia Branch NAACP calls for a commitment to preserving and promoting a comprehensive historical narrative that acknowledges the injustices of slavery and champions the resilience of those who fought for freedom. It is through this lens of truth that we can work towards a more equitable future for all.

We must stand together and condemn this action!


Context of the Removal

The exhibit, titled "The President’s House: Freedom and Slavery in the Making of a New Nation," was dismantled on January 22, 2026, by the National Park Service (NPS). 

  • Administrative Directive: The removal followed a March 2025 executive order from the Trump administration titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," which directed the removal of materials deemed to "inappropriately disparage" the U.S. past.
  • Legal Action: The City of Philadelphia filed a federal lawsuit against the Interior Department and the NPS to stop the removal, citing a 2006 cooperative agreement that requires the federal government to consult with city officials before altering exhibits.
  • Broader Opposition: Other local leaders, including Philadelphia Mayor Cherelle Parker, City Council President Kenyatta Johnson, and Governor Josh Shapiro, also condemned the move as an attempt to "whitewash" American history.

Latriece Watkins Takes The Helm At Sam’s Club

Walmart names Latriece Watkins Sam's Club president and CEO in leadership shuffle

After nearly 30 years at Walmart, Latriece Watkins will take over as CEO of Sam’s Club. 

Watkins, EVP and Chief Merchandising Officer for Walmart U.S., is being named President and CEO of Sam’s Club U.S. Watkins started her career with Walmart as an intern in 1997. Among her many successes, she reshaped the Walmart U.S. assortment strategy, drove operational excellence, and ensured a consistent, trusted shopping experience. Watkins has held a wide range of leadership roles across Sam’s Club, Walmart U.S. merchandising, People and U.S. store operations.

Watkins has spent her entire professional career within Walmart Inc., rising through various leadership levels. 

  • Early Career: She joined Walmart in 1997 as a real estate intern. Over the next two decades, she held numerous roles across merchandising, human resources, and U.S. store operations.
  • Senior Leadership: Before becoming CEO of Sam's Club, she served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer for Walmart U.S., a position she held starting in 2023.
  • Key Contributions: She is credited with transforming Walmart’s assortment strategy to appeal to a broader demographic, including higher-income shoppers. She also led the company's Shared Value Network team, which focuses on increasing racial equity in the criminal justice system.

As CEO, Watkins is tasked with leading a division that currently generates over $90 billion in annual sales across nearly 600 locations. Her immediate goals include: 

  • Competing with Costco: Strengthening Sam's Club's value proposition to more directly challenge its main rival in the warehouse club sector.
  • Private Label Growth: Expanding and improving the Member’s Mark brand, which currently accounts for roughly one-third of the club's revenue.
  • Tech-Driven Growth: Aligning with Walmart’s "People Led, Tech-Powered" initiative to enhance the omnichannel and digital shopping experience. 

Following her appointment as President and CEO of Sam's Club U.S. in January 2026, Latriece Watkins shared her vision for the role, emphasizing a focus on culture, membership growth, and the integration of technology in retail. 

In a LinkedIn post, Watkins expressed her honor in leading the "next chapter" of Sam's Club, focusing on "protecting and amplifying our culture, fully leveraging the power of our company, and winning omnichannel retail together and with intention". She highlighted the unique aspects of the brand, noting the pride associates take in serving members, the focus on value and quality, and teamwork. Watkins, who started as a Walmart intern in 1997, views her career success as "personal" and attributes it to "consistency, humility, and the willingness to do the hard work when no one is watching". 

Drawing from her experience as Walmart's Chief Merchant, Watkins plans to bring a customer-first philosophy to Sam's Club. She emphasizes starting conversations with the customer to understand their needs and how to serve them. Watkins also describes Walmart Inc. as an "'and' company," balancing being "people-led and tech-powered" with "execution and innovation".


Watkins holds degrees from Spelman College (B.A. in Political Science) and the University of Arkansas School of Law (Juris Doctorate). She serves on the board of directors for Live Nation Entertainment and is involved with local organizations like the Thaden School and the Mercy Health Foundation of Northwest Arkansas. 


STEELERS COACH MIKE TOMLIN & ROONEY RULE

End of an Era: Mike Tomlin’s Departure and What It Means for Black Coaches in the NFL

January 15, 2026, From PittsburghUrbanMedia.com


Mike Tomlin has stepped down as head coach of the Pittsburgh Steelers after 19 seasons, marking the end of one of the most stable and successful coaching tenures in modern NFL history. His departure immediately reignites urgent conversations about the state of Black head coaches in the league—and the effectiveness of the Rooney Rule.

What Mike Tomlin Represented

Tomlin was more than a head coach. He was a standard-bearer.

As the NFL’s longest-tenured head coach at the time of his resignation, Tomlin built a legacy defined by consistency, leadership, and results. He won a Super Bowl, appeared in two, and never posted a losing season—an achievement few coaches in league history can match.

Yet despite his success, Tomlin was often one of only a small handful of Black head coaches in the NFL. His departure further shrinks that already limited representation, leaving a visible void at the highest level of leadership in professional football.

It is reported, "At present, Aaron Glenn of the New York Jets, Todd Bowles of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and DeMeco Ryans of the Houston Texans are the NFL’s only remaining Black head coaches, despite the fact that roughly 67% of the league’s players are Black. The contrast underscores a persistent disconnect between representation on the field and opportunity on the sidelines.” (Amsterdam News)

A Moment That Demands Accountability

Tomlin’s longevity transcended race—but his exit underscores the persistent structural barriers Black coaches continue to face. While teams routinely praise diversity, hiring trends reveal a different reality: Black candidates struggle not only to land head coaching jobs, but to maintain them long-term.

His resignation shifts the conversation from individual excellence to systemic accountability. If a coach with Tomlin’s résumé is the exception rather than the norm, the system itself must be examined.

The Rooney Rule: Intent vs. Impact

Established in 2003 and named after late Steelers owner Dan Rooney, the Rooney Rule requires NFL teams to interview minority candidates for head coaching and senior football operations roles. The intent was clear: expand access and opportunity.

More than two decades later, critics argue the rule often satisfies procedure rather than purpose. Teams frequently comply with the requirement while lacking genuine intent to hire minority candidates—turning interviews into formalities instead of pathways.

Tomlin himself acknowledged these shortcomings. He supported changes to the rule that would incentivize teams for developing and hiring minority talent, rather than relying solely on punitive measures. He also pushed back against the notion—sometimes implied by coaching “pipeline” programs—that a lack of minority hires reflects a lack of qualified candidates. In his view, the talent has always been there.

Where the League Stands Now

Despite multiple expansions to the Rooney Rule—including requiring two external minority candidates for head coaching positions and formally including women—the results remain underwhelming.

The percentage of Black head coaches continues to lag far behind the percentage of Black players in the league. As of recent data, African Americans make up more than half of NFL rosters, yet leadership roles do not reflect that reality. Tomlin’s departure only widens the gap.

Implications for the Steelers—and the NFL

For the Steelers, this moment presents both a challenge and a test. The organization long associated with the Rooney Rule must now demonstrate whether its commitment to diversity extends beyond legacy and symbolism into action.

For the NFL, Tomlin’s exit is a reckoning. It forces the league to confront hard questions:

  • Are current diversity measures effective—or merely performative?
  • What additional enforcement or incentives are necessary?
  • How does the league ensure Black coaches are not just interviewed, but hired and retained?

A Turning Point, Not an Ending

Mike Tomlin’s departure should not signal regression. It should serve as a catalyst.

The Rooney Rule was a beginning—not a finish line. If the NFL is serious about equity, this moment demands more than reflection. It requires reform, accountability, and a renewed commitment to ensuring leadership opportunities reflect the diversity of the game itself.

Because progress without power—and without permanence—is not progress at all.


The news shaping our communities nationwide

The Foundations of a Phenomenal Black Woman: Alexandria Echols-Simpson

The plethora of quotes regarding foundations testify to their importance.  Some of the foundation quotes are as follows:   

  • “The tallest towers begin with a single brick laid with care.”
  • “Strength is not born overnight; it is forged in the foundations we lay daily.”
  • “Secure foundations are silent victories that sustain us through life's loudest battles.”
  • “Underneath every success story is a map of hard work and foundational resilience.”
  • “A solid foundation is the compass that steers dreams to reality.”
  • “Foundations are the ink in the pen writing your destiny.”
  • “The foundational steps are the soul of every achievement.”
  • “The purpose of a foundation is not seen, but its power is felt.”

(See, https://aigift.alibaba.com/quotes/strong-foundation-quotes)   


When it comes to Black women becoming physicians, strong foundations constitute a sine que non because Black women continue to be significantly underrepresented among physicians. According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, they make up 2.8% of doctors in the U.S. This percentage is significantly lower than Black women’s representation within the total female population in society at 13%. (Forbes, May 19, 2025).  Dr. Alexandria Echols-Simpson is not only among that 2.8% but she is also a Black woman who “is doing it all,” i.e., married, mother of 4 children, co-parent of a stepson during his early childhood years, successful medical practice, and public servant.  She graduated from the University of Michigan in 1992 with a Bachelor of Science in Biology.  In 1999, she graduated from Case Western Reserve University as a Doctor of Medicine.   


Regarding her medical practice, Dr Echols-Simpson is a board-certified family physician and has been in practice since 1999.  During the early years she did obstetrical care along with primary care.  As her family grew, she moved away from obstetrics and continued to provide care ranging from newborns to geriatric patients, focusing on women’s care and primary prevention of chronic medical problems.  She has practiced in an inner city, a suburb of a large metropolis, and, currently provides care in the rural Midwest.    


During a recent visit with Dr. Echols-Simpson, I asked her what contributed to the tremendous academic, athletic, and professional success throughout her extended family.  Without hesitating, she pointed to a picture of two women on the wall and said, “Those  women right there.  My maternal and paternal grandmothers provided a tremendous foundation for my parents which flowed down to my siblings and me.    


My paternal grandmother gave birth to five boys and three girls.  My father was the youngest.  My paternal grandfather died when my father was 2 years old, leaving my grandmother to raise the 8 children on her own.  She was big on education.  She instilled respect, discipline, kindness and love for one another.  She instilled a Christian foundation.  


My maternal grandmother, who was a few inches shy of 5 feet, raised 3 girls and 1 boy.  The boy grew to nearly 6’5”.  She was small but mighty.  She also was big on education and instilled the same Christian values as my paternal grandmother.  She commanded respect from her children and expected them to extend that same respect to others.  She also ingrained discipline, kindness and love for all.   


The foregoing values grew in my parents, became second nature to them, and were passed down to my siblings and me.  My parents also were involved and supportive, in everything, all the time, but not in a hovering way.  We went to church as a family, attended Sunday School and Bible study. They talked to us, asked about our day, and how school was.  They went to parent teacher conferences, and were involved in the PTA.  They supported us by being active in the boys and girl scouts.  They helped with coaching and cheered for us when we participated in various sports.  When we were right, they advocated for us.  When we were wrong, we were told we were wrong and we were appropriately corrected.  Their discipline was effective, seldom did we repeat the wrong.   


My parents knew who our friends were, they knew the parents of those friends. We had rules when we were out “socializing”.  Don’t go into anybody’s house, don’t go across “such-and-such” street.  Be in the house before the streetlights came on.  If a rule was broken, we faced the consequences.  And again, seldom did we repeat the wrong.  This is just part of the foundation that got me to where I am now.  I hope I am living up to the standards set forth by my parents and grandparents.  I hope my husband and I are instilling these values, not only in our children but also being an example for our community.”   


Dr. Echols-Simpson’s emphasis on foundational values and behavior led me to ask her, “When it comes to parenting during the 21st Century AI Universe, what advice would you give to parents of preschool children?”  She responded as follows, “Regarding AI being incorporated into our families, homes and communities, especially those families with preschool children, parents should remember that they are “the parents”, not Alexa, Siri or Curio (an AI toy for tots).   


Parents, humans, should be the main primary caregivers tending, teaching, guiding, hugging, playing, talking, tucking in, comforting, and giving advice to the children, not a computer.  This is especially true for preschoolers who are very moldable. I believe children love and appreciate when their parents have “hands on” interactions, especially when the interactions are done in a loving manner.   


AI can be helpful when needing an answer to something you typically would have to “look up” or “Google”. It also can be helpful for educational support when teaching colors, numbers, ABCs, etc.  However, it cannot offer human-to-human contact, the parent to child interaction that builds trust, socialization skills, and the strong foundation that will help the child become successful in all aspects of their lives. It is recommended that children should not have more than 2 hours of screen time daily. It is likely that, soon, there will be recommendations regarding limits on AI interaction, too. AI should not be used as a baby-sitter or friend for children. Parents need to parent.”   In sum, modifying one of this article’s initial quotes, ““Strength is not born overnight; it is forged in the foundations we lay daily, starting with parents being parents.”


Dr. Alexandria Echols-Simpson has demonstrated the value of phenomenal Black women doing so over decades.   


Jack L. Daniel 

Co-founder, Freed Panther Society 

Contributor, Pittsburgh Urban Media 

Author, Negotiating a Historically White University While Black 

January 12, 2026     


 

Dr. Alexandria Echols-Simpson

The news shaping our communities nationwide

Richard Smallwood, Grammy-nominated gospel singer, dies at 77

Richard Smallwood passed away on December 30, 2025, at the age of 77 due to complications from kidney failure. A public Celebration of Life is scheduled for Saturday, January 24, 2026, at the First Baptist Church of Glenarden International in Maryland. He is remembered by peers like Chaka Khan and Kirk Franklin as a "musical genius" who bridged the gap between the sanctuary and the concert hall. 

Career Highlights & LegacySmallwood’s five-decade career left an indelible mark on both sacred and mainstream music: 

  • Iconic Compositions: He wrote several "modern hymns," most notably "Total Praise,"which he composed during a period of personal sorrow. Other famous works include "Center of My Joy," "I Love the Lord" (recorded by Whitney Houston), and "Anthem of Praise".
  • Musical Groups: He formed the Richard Smallwood Singers in 1977, whose debut 1982 album spent 87 weeks on the Billboard Gospel charts. He later founded the ensemble Vision, producing hits like "Healing".
  • Accolades: An eight-time Grammy Award nominee, he received three Dove Awards, seven Stellar Awards, and was inducted into the Gospel Music Hall of Fame in 2006. In 2023, he received the President’s Lifetime Achievement Award from Joe Biden. 

Biography

  • Early Life: Born in Atlanta and raised in Washington, D.C., he was a child prodigy who began playing piano at age five.
  • Education: He graduated cum laude from Howard University with degrees in vocal performance and piano. He later returned to Howard to earn a Master of Divinity in 2004.
  • Ministry: He was an ordained minister and served as the Artist-in-Residence at Metropolitan Baptist Church in Washington, D.C.. 

Prominent Tributes Artists like Chaka Khan described how his music transformed her and called him her favorite pianist, anticipating singing with him in heaven. Donald Lawrence called Smallwood a "musical genius" and a generous friend. Publicist Bill Carpenter highlighted Smallwood's dedication to creating music that resonated deeply with people. Rev. George L. Parks Jr. recalled Smallwood's blessings through his piano playing. Musical Legacy QuotesThe National Convention of Gospel Choirs and Choruses recognized him as a "gospel music giant". His signature song, "Total Praise," was described as providing a way to express deep spiritual feelings. Many noted his historical impact as a "mold-breaker" who blended classical and Black gospel traditions. Smallwood himself expressed a desire for his songs to have lasting impact.

Civil Rights Leader Tribute

Statue of Black Teen Activist Replaces Robert E. Lee in U.S. Capitol

The statue of Barbara Rose Johns, an African American civil rights leader who led a student strike at her segregated Virginia high school in 1951, now stands in the U.S. Capitol. It replaces a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee and honors her fight for equal education and lasting impact on American history.

According to CBS News, the unveiling in Emancipation Hall drew Virginia officials, members of Congress, and more than 200 of Johns’ relatives. The Eastern Senior High School choir performed songs like “Ain’t Gonna Let Nobody Turn Me ’Round,” setting a celebratory tone for the historic moment.

At just 16, Johns led hundreds of her classmates at R.R. Moton High School in Farmville, Virginia, in a protest against poor school conditions. Their strike attracted NAACP lawyers, contributing to the Brown v. Board of Education case that ended school segregation in 1954.

The bronze statue shows Johns holding a worn book above her head beside a lectern. Its pedestal reads, “Are we going to just accept these conditions, or are we going to do something about it?” and includes the Biblical line, “And a little child shall lead them.” It symbolizes her courage and leadership at a young age.

The statue replaces the Robert E. Lee figure, which stood for 111 years before being removed in 2020 amid renewed attention to Confederate monuments. Virginia leaders said the change honors a true patriot who fought for justice rather than a figure tied to slavery.

Sculpted by Steven Weitzman, the statue now joins the National Statuary Hall Collection in the Capitol’s Crypt, representing Virginia alongside George Washington. Visitors can see it as part of a larger display of 35 statues across the Capitol, celebrating influential Americans.

After her activism, Johns became a librarian, raised five children, and continued to make a quiet impact until her death at 56. Her story is remembered at the Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, and her former high school is now a museum and National Historic Landmark.


Source: BlackNews

Black Soldiers

US removal of panels honoring Black soldiers at WWII cemetery in the Netherlands draws backlash

Ever since a U.S. military cemetery in the southern Netherlands removed two displays recognizing Black troops who helped to liberate Europe from the Nazis, visitors have filled the guestbook with objections.

Sometime in the spring, the American Battle Monuments Commission, the U.S. government agency responsible for maintaining memorial sites outside of the United States, removed the panels from the visitors center at the American Cemetery in Margraten, the final resting place for roughly 8,300 U.S. soldiers, set in rolling hills near the border with Belgium and Germany.

The move came after U.S. President Donald Trump issued a series of executive orders ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs. “Our country will be woke no longer,” Trump said in an address to Congress in March.

The removal, carried out without public explanation, has angered Dutch officials, the families of U.S. soldiers and the local residents who honor the American sacrifice by caring for the graves.

U.S. Ambassador to the Netherlands Joe Popolo seemed to support the removal of the displays. “The signs at Margraten are not intended to promote an agenda that criticizes America,” he wrote on social media following a visit to the cemetery after the controversy had erupted. Popolo declined a request for comment.

The displays highlighted the sacrifices of Black Americans

One display told the story of 23-year-old George H. Pruitt, a Black soldier buried at the cemetery, who died attempting to rescue a comrade from drowning in 1945. The other described the U.S. policy of racial segregation in place during World War II.

Some 1 million Black soldiers enlisted in the U.S. military during the war, serving in separate units, mostly doing menial tasks but also fighting in some combat missions. An all-Black unit dug the thousands of graves in Margraten during the brutal 1944-45 season of famine in the German-occupied Netherlands known in the Hunger Winter.

Cor Linssen, the 79-year-old son of a Black American soldier and a Dutch mother, is one of those who opposes the removal of the panels.

Linssen grew up some 30 miles (50 kilometers) away from the cemetery and although he didn’t learn who his father was until later in life, he knew he was the son of a Black soldier.


Source: AP

Celebrating Women

THE ANGRY BLACK WOMAN: Resisting a Repugnant Stereotype

“Racism. The belief in the inherent superiority of one race over all others and thereby the right to dominance, manifest and implied. …My response to racism is anger. I have lived with that anger, ignoring it, feeding upon it, learning to use it before it laid my visions to waste, for most of my life. …My fear of anger taught me nothing. ...Women responding to racism means women responding to anger; Anger of exclusion, of  unquestioned privilege, of racial distortions, of silence, ill-use, stereotyping, defensiveness, misnaming, betrayal, and co-optation…”  (Audre Lorde, 1981, “The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism”)

The effective pursuit of social justice requires that ongoing attention be paid to the systems, structures, strategies, and tactics that uphold a given oppressive system.  Accordingly, Women’s History Month is a good time to review the Angry Black Woman(ABW) stereotype which was created by racists to control the narrative related to and, in turn, the behavior of Black American women!  

The insidious ABW stereotype’s behavior controlling dynamic is as follows:  If Black women do not comply with a submissive persona, then they are deemed to be angry, castrating, intransient, hostile, overbearing, militant, and everything else but civil. Indeed, the ABW stereotype is sadistic in that its perpetrators’ pleasure is derived from Black women enduringthe pain inflicted by realties such as [1] employmentdiscrimination, [2] overrepresentation as victims of violent crimes, [3] the lack of high quality and accessible maternal health care, and, in general [4] being the “mules” of American society! At her best racist and sexist-derived adult persona, the Black woman would be an ingenue awaiting the guidance of her male patriarch.

Resisting the ABW stereotype in 1981, Audre Lorde explained as follows:  “…Black women are expected to use our anger only in the service of other people’s salvation or learning. But that time is over. …For it is not the anger of Black women which is dripping down over this globe like a diseased liquid. It is not my anger that launches rockets, spends over sixty thousand dollars a second on missiles and other agents of war and death, slaughters children in cities, stockpiles nerve gas and chemical bombs, sodomizes our daughters and our earth. It is not the anger of Black women which corrodes into blind, dehumanizing power, bent upon the annihilation of us all unless we meet it with what we have, our power to examine and to redefine the terms upon which we will live and work; our power to envision and to reconstruct, anger by painful anger, stone upon heavy stone, a future of pollinating difference and the earth to support our choices.”

When one has been hurt systemically as long as Black American women have, then their personal and collective freedom demand that they not accede to the ABW stereotype. As Maya Angelou stated, “You should be angry. You must not be bitter. Bitterness is like cancer. It eats upon the host. It doesn’t do anything to the object of its displeasure. So, use that anger. You write it. You paint it. You dance it. You march it. You vote it. You do everything about it. You talk it. Never stop talking it.” 

Seemingly, National Youth Poet Laureate Amanda Gorman was tuned into Angelou’s advice during the following exchange.

“She’s just a poet. That was the moment the studio changed.

During a live panel discussion, Karoline Leavitt dismissed Amanda Gorman’s comments about the growing disconnect between political messaging and everyday communities, waving her off with a familiar refrain: stick to poetry. The room expected Amanda to offer a polite smile, soften the tension, and retreat into metaphor. She didn’t.

She leaned forward, calm and composed.

‘I may write poems,” she said evenly, but don’t confuse art with naivety. You may see this country through briefing rooms and polling data. I see it through classrooms, communities, and conversations with young people who are shaping its future.’

The atmosphere shifted instantly. Smiles faded. The studio fell quiet.

‘Poetry is built on truth,  …On listening closely enough to hear what others overlook. And right now, many Americans feel like their realities are being translated into slogans instead of being understood.’

For a brief moment, there was no response.

No interruption.

No comeback.

Not because the exchange was dramatic—but because it resonated.

Amanda Gorman didn’t argue legislation.

She simply refused to let her art be mistaken for silence.”

FULL STORY: https://verixo.blog/posts/just-hk-khuyen123-team-tien-tntg

In 2026, those who are deemed to be angry Black women should know that they are in great history-making company, e.g., Amanda Gorman, Angel Reese, Lena Horne, Shirey Chisholm, Michele Obama, Maxine Waters, Serena Williams, Anita Hill, Meghan Markle, Alice Walker, Simone Biles, Toni Morrison, Coco Gauff, Shonda Rhimes, and Kamala Harris as well as the multitude of Black women who demand high quality and equal treatment in classrooms, meeting rooms, medical rooms, or simply while using public transportation on a given day after being overworked and underpaid as in the case of Ms. Rosa Parks who was sick and tired of being sick and tired of dealing with the injustices faced by Black people. 

I benefitted from a Black woman whom White public-schoolofficials deemed an ABW every time she “showed up and showed out” on my behalf.  One notable instance was when, without my or my parents’ inputs, a school official placed me in Industrial Arts instead of the College Curriculum.  Unannounced, my Mama went to the school and refused to leave the building until I was signed up for Algebra I, College English, Biology, and the rest of the courses designed for students interested in going on to college.  Thanks, Mama, for harnessing your anger and, in turn, launching me on a more than half century career in higher education.

Parenthetically, it would be a significant lacuna if it were not acknowledged herein that all too many Black men have used the ABW stereotype.  Some of them have done so to justify things such as [1] their individual abuse of Black women; [2] their romantic relations with women of other races; and [3] their assignment of Black women to secondary leadership roles in Black churches and political organizations.  

An especially egregious act by some Black men is the fact that a significant number of them voted for Trump, notwithstanding the fact that “…During an interview …with Fox Business network anchor Maria Bartiromo, Trump launched into a bevy of attacks on women he's deemed his top 2020 targets of the election season. …his distaste for Harris, who identifies as Black and Indian American, stood out as he took most of his time to assail the senator's character.  ‘And now, you have - a sort of - a mad woman, I call her, because she was so angry and - such hatred with Justice Kavanaugh,’ Trump told Bartiromo. ‘I mean, I've never seen anything like it. She was the angriest of the group and they were all angry. ... These are seriously ill people.’ …Trump called Harris a ‘nasty’ woman and said she was ‘probably nastier than even Pocahontas to Joe Biden’ during the Democratic debates, referring to Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts…” (See, Trump deploys the 'angry Black woman' trope against Kamala Harris | Congresswoman Frederica Wilson).

Notwithstanding the foregoing dynamics, Maya Angeou’s words still ring true.

“You may write me down in history

With your bitter, twisted lies,

You may trod me in the very dirt

But still, like dust, I'll rise.

…Just like moons and like suns,

With the certainty of tides,

Just like hopes springing high,

Still, I'll rise.

…You may shoot me with your words,

You may cut me with your eyes,

You may kill me with your hatefulness,

But still, like air, I’ll rise…”

Jack L. Daniel, Co-founder Freed Panther Society

Contributor, Pittsburgh Urban Media

Author, Negotiating a Historically White University While Black

March 1, 2026

Copyright © 2026 pittsburghurbanmedia.com - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.

Accept & Close